Jorge Manrubia
9b4169c7ca
With a single database this problem is not as bad, but it feels safer to do things right. Also, not everyone in an account has access to all the bubbles.
39 lines
1017 B
Ruby
39 lines
1017 B
Ruby
class User < ApplicationRecord
|
|
include Accessor, Assignee, Avatar, Role, Transferable
|
|
|
|
belongs_to :account
|
|
|
|
has_many :sessions, dependent: :destroy
|
|
has_secure_password validations: false
|
|
|
|
has_many :comments, inverse_of: :creator, dependent: :destroy
|
|
|
|
has_many :notifications, dependent: :destroy
|
|
|
|
has_many :filters, foreign_key: :creator_id, inverse_of: :creator, dependent: :destroy
|
|
has_many :pops, dependent: :nullify
|
|
has_many :pins, dependent: :destroy
|
|
has_many :pinned_bubbles, through: :pins, source: :bubble
|
|
|
|
normalizes :email_address, with: ->(value) { value.strip.downcase }
|
|
|
|
scope :alphabetically, -> { order("lower(name)") }
|
|
|
|
def initials
|
|
name.to_s.scan(/\b\p{L}/).join.upcase
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def deactivate
|
|
transaction do
|
|
sessions.delete_all
|
|
accesses.destroy_all
|
|
update! active: false, email_address: deactived_email_address
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
private
|
|
def deactived_email_address
|
|
email_address.sub(/@/, "-deactivated-#{SecureRandom.uuid}@")
|
|
end
|
|
end
|